CSS pseudo-element Solar System using semantic HTML

This is a complete reworking of another author’s basic reproduction of the classic model of our solar system using CSS. By using pseudo-elements (again) I wanted to reproduce as much as possible without presentational HTML and JavaScript. In addition, by hooking into HTML microdata I’ve put together a rough scale model of the solar system that demonstrates some further uses of CSS generated content.

There are three demos for this experiment which is based on Alex Giron’s original Our Solar System in CSS3 experiment.

The advanced demo is a rough scale model of the Solar System that uses semantic HTML and makes extensive use of CSS pseudo-elements, generated content, and various bits of CSS3.

The advanced demo (keyboard support) is an attempt to provide keyboard support using CSS and a slight modification to the HTML. I’ve commented out the animations in this version of the demo.

The basic demo uses the same HTML as the “advanced demo” to relatively faithfully reproduce Alex’s original experiment without the need for presentational HTML or JavaScript.

Why rework the original experiment?

I wanted to see if it could be done without the use of presentational HTML elements. A lot of CSS3 demonstrations are still using empty span elements or other presentational HTML hooks for styling. I prefer to see how far you can go by using semantic HTML as a base.

It is fairly simple to replace the extra span elements in Alex’s experiment with CSS pseudo-elements (part of CSS 2.1). In fact, the vast majority of the original solar system experiment can be reproduced with just a list with each list item containing a heading and a paragraph.

However, I’ve tried to experiment a bit further with generated content, shadows, and simplifying the CSS that controls the positioning and rounding of objects. Doing this exposed more differences in how modern browsers are implementing CSS3 and I’ve described some of those differences and bugs below.

A scale model of the solar system and examples of CSS generated content

The main demo is a scale model of the solar system. It uses 3 different scales: one for the object diameters; one for the distance of the planets from the sun; and one for the orbital period of each planet.

Semantic HTML and Microdata

The HTML is just a list with each item containing a title and description. I’ve included some basic use of HTML Microdata to keep it semantic but provide hooks to add some generated content about the scale used.

<li id="earth" itemscope>
  <h2 itemprop="object">Earth
  <dl>
    <dt>Description</dt>
    <dd itemprop="description">Earth is an ocean planet. Our home world's abundance of water - and life - makes it unique in our solar system. Other planets, plus a few moons, have ice, atmospheres, seasons and even weather, but only on Earth does the whole complicated mix come together in a way that encourages life - and lots of it.</dd>
    <dt>Diameter</dt>
    <dd itemprop="diameter">12,755 <abbr title="kilometers">km</abbr></dd>
    <dt>Distance from sun</dt>
    <dd itemprop="distance">150×10<sup>6</sup> <abbr title="kilometers">km</abbr></dd>
    <dt>Orbital period</dt>
    <dd itemprop="orbit">365<abbr title="days">d</abbr></dd>
  </dl>
</li>

Using CSS pseudo-elements and generated content

Pseudo-elements are used to produce the planets, Saturn’s ring, the planet names, and to add the scale information.

Given that the scales only make sense when CSS is loaded it isn’t appropriate to have the scales described in the HTML. Both demos use the same HTML but only one of them is a rough scale model. Therefore, in the scale model demo I’ve used generated content to present the ratios and append extra information to the headings.

header h1:after {content:": A scale model";}
header h2:after {content:"Planet diameters 1px : 1,220 km / Distance from sun 1px : 7,125,000 km / Orbital period 1s : 4d";}

#earth dd[itemprop=diameter]:after {content:" (5px) / ";}
#earth dd[itemprop=distance]:after {content:" (22px) / ";}
#earth dd[itemprop=orbit]:after {content:" (91s)";}

Even more complex 3D presentations are likely to be possible using webkit-perspective and other 3D transforms.

Keyboard support

With a little modification it is possible to provide some form of keyboard support so that the additional information and highlighting can be viewed without using a mouse. Doing so requires adding block-level anchors (allowed in HTML5) and modifying some of the CSS selectors.

Modern browser CSS3 inconsistencies

This experiment only works adequately in modern browsers such as Safari 4+, Chrome 4+, Firefox 3.6+ and Opera 10.5+.

But even among the current crop of modern browsers there are bugs and varying levels of support for different CSS properties and values. In particular, webkit’s box-shadow implementation has issues.

There are a few other unusual :hover bugs in Opera 10.5 (most obvious in the basic demo). It should also be noted that the :hover area remains square in all modern browsers even when you apply a border-radius to the element.

CSS3 animations

A word of warning. CSS animations were likely never intended for this sort of abuse and your webkit browser (the only rendering engine supporting animations at present) is going to struggle. I’ve left them in there for the purposes of the demonstration but they are completely impractical for this level of manipulation, in my opinion.

Border radius

There are also a few other peculiarities around percentage units for border radius. A border-radius value of 50% should produce a circle for any square object. Of the modern browsers, setting the border-radius value to 50% will only produce a circle in Safari 5, Chrome 5, and Firefox 3.6.

Safari 4 doesn’t appear to support percentage units for border radius at all (which is why the CSS in the demos explicitly sets a -webkit-border-radius value for each object). Safari 5 and Chrome 5 do support percentage units for this property. However, Chrome 5 has difficulty rendering a 1px wide border on a large circle. Most of the border simply isn’t rendered.

In Opera 10.5, if you set border-radius to 50% you don’t always get a circle so I have had to redeclare the border-radius for each object in pixel units.

Opera 10.5’s incorrect rendering of border-radius:50%

It appears that this is one aspect of Opera’s non-prefixed border-radius implementation that is incorrect and in need of fixing.

Box shadow

Safari 4’s inferior box-shadow implementation means that inset shadows are not rendered on the planet bodies. In addition, the second box-shadow applied to Saturn (used to separate the planet from its ring) is completely missing in Safari 4 as it does not support a spread radius value.

Safari 5 and Chrome 5 are better but still problematic. The second box-shadow is not perfectly round as the box-shadow seems to use the pseudo-element’s computed border-radius. Furthermore, Chrome 5 on Windows does not properly support inset box-shadow meaning that the shadow ignores the border-radius declaration and appears as a protruding square.

Safari 5 and Chrome 5 make different mistakes in their rendering of this box-shadow

The use of box-shadow to separate Saturn from the ring isn’t strictly necessary. You can create the separated ring using a border but box-shadow cannot be applied in a way that casts it over a border. Another alternative would be to add a black border around the planet to give the illusion of space between itself and the ring, but all browsers display a few pixels of unwanted background colour all along the outer edge of the rounded border.

I wanted the ring to share the appearance of a shadow being cast on it. Opera 10.5 and Firefox 3.6 get it right. Both webkit browsers get it wrong.

How appropriate is all this?

Probably not very appropriate. There are other technologies that are better suited to this kind of thing. But that isn’t the point of these CSS of experiments.

Reply on Twitter Retweet on Twitter Favorite on Twitter